![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoNzfsAAX1F3a_8T3PSb2Gbv_ChToAsyXQTs5iuNNjrTjSqiGgkMxieIXr7xeKgf45LF08GnfnMyRKiHE9ODmLOeQM0NWQmrVgHxEJ5K63_rGV3trAJY5YfCWc4CN7gnAydLK55yszDRk/s400/Fisherman.jpg)
Several areas were cited for improved sealife populations due to effective fisheries management including Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, and Vanuatu. These regions were able to develop management programs that involved local communities in determining and managing protected areas. One of the challenges being faced is in "mid-development" countries - countries that have a growing commercial need for fishing but do not have the infrastructure in place to effectively manage their ocean resources. Poorer nations do not have the commercial means to severely impact their local sealife populations whereas well-developed countries have the required infrastructure in place to implement and enforce management policies. In between are the transitional mid-development countries that need both large bureaucratic and local community involvement - and there are places that have done that successfully.
"One of the things that we’re seeing that is giving me some signs of hope is that in many places throughout the Western Indian Ocean, there’s a real trend toward co-management. We’re seeing a very big devolution of power of managing of coastal resources from centralized governments toward communities," said Josh Cinner, social scientist from James Cook University. "There are some instances where you see examples of blending customary management and contemporary management. Where we do see this happening, we see great success—places like Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands, where there is considerably more fish inside of these community-managed areas."
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh13hTuwC3VXZMKSKAWB_iMZr2qEes8O43wo42sgEMPLKL4QKIhk9CrfSnizUjx4eo6dGyuA7oeClF1lOo8nisuBzRuVPFbZi86JSoXbTnJxKkzOOetZVgR5HWuRbBZMQA4Pa0EbufcGYI/s320/AAAS+logo.gif)
No comments:
Post a Comment